Information on Result #2241739
Linear OA(4215, 245, F4, 125) (dual of [245, 30, 126]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4216, 246, F4, 126) (dual of [246, 30, 127]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4216, 246, F4, 127) (dual of [246, 30, 128]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6431, 41, F64, 31) (dual of [41, 10, 32]-code or 41-arc in PG(30,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6431, 64, F64, 31) (dual of [64, 33, 32]-code or 64-arc in PG(30,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(33,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6431, 64, F64, 31) (dual of [64, 33, 32]-code or 64-arc in PG(30,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6431, 41, F64, 31) (dual of [41, 10, 32]-code or 41-arc in PG(30,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.