Information on Result #2241817
Linear OA(4218, 248, F4, 127) (dual of [248, 30, 128]-code), using 4 times truncation based on linear OA(4222, 252, F4, 131) (dual of [252, 30, 132]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6432, 42, F64, 32) (dual of [42, 10, 33]-code or 42-arc in PG(31,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6432, 64, F64, 32) (dual of [64, 32, 33]-code or 64-arc in PG(31,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(32,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6432, 64, F64, 32) (dual of [64, 32, 33]-code or 64-arc in PG(31,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6432, 42, F64, 32) (dual of [42, 10, 33]-code or 42-arc in PG(31,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.