Information on Result #2241990
Linear OA(4183, 234, F4, 90) (dual of [234, 51, 91]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4184, 235, F4, 91) (dual of [235, 51, 92]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4184, 235, F4, 92) (dual of [235, 51, 93]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6430, 47, F64, 30) (dual of [47, 17, 31]-code or 47-arc in PG(29,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6430, 64, F64, 30) (dual of [64, 34, 31]-code or 64-arc in PG(29,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(34,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6430, 64, F64, 30) (dual of [64, 34, 31]-code or 64-arc in PG(29,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6430, 47, F64, 30) (dual of [47, 17, 31]-code or 47-arc in PG(29,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(4183, 117, F4, 2, 90) (dual of [(117, 2), 51, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
2 | Linear OOA(4183, 78, F4, 3, 90) (dual of [(78, 3), 51, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] |