Information on Result #2242110
Linear OA(4217, 253, F4, 122) (dual of [253, 36, 123]-code), using 5 times truncation based on linear OA(4222, 258, F4, 127) (dual of [258, 36, 128]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6431, 43, F64, 31) (dual of [43, 12, 32]-code or 43-arc in PG(30,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6431, 64, F64, 31) (dual of [64, 33, 32]-code or 64-arc in PG(30,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(33,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6431, 64, F64, 31) (dual of [64, 33, 32]-code or 64-arc in PG(30,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6431, 43, F64, 31) (dual of [43, 12, 32]-code or 43-arc in PG(30,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.