Information on Result #2250078
Linear OA(8102, 114, F8, 69) (dual of [114, 12, 70]-code), using 6 times truncation based on linear OA(8108, 120, F8, 75) (dual of [120, 12, 76]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6418, 24, F64, 18) (dual of [24, 6, 19]-code or 24-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6418, 64, F64, 18) (dual of [64, 46, 19]-code or 64-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(46,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6418, 64, F64, 18) (dual of [64, 46, 19]-code or 64-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- linear OA(83, 5, F8, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,8) or 5-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- linear OA(6418, 24, F64, 18) (dual of [24, 6, 19]-code or 24-arc in PG(17,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.