Information on Result #2250373
Linear OA(8147, 157, F8, 108) (dual of [157, 10, 109]-code), using 11 times truncation based on linear OA(8158, 168, F8, 119) (dual of [168, 10, 120]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6423, 28, F64, 23) (dual of [28, 5, 24]-code or 28-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6423, 64, F64, 23) (dual of [64, 41, 24]-code or 64-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(41,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6423, 64, F64, 23) (dual of [64, 41, 24]-code or 64-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- linear OA(84, 6, F8, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(84, 8, F8, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(4,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(84, 8, F8, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- linear OA(6423, 28, F64, 23) (dual of [28, 5, 24]-code or 28-arc in PG(22,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.