Information on Result #2250445
Linear OA(8117, 133, F8, 77) (dual of [133, 16, 78]-code), using 3 times truncation based on linear OA(8120, 136, F8, 80) (dual of [136, 16, 81]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6426, 34, F64, 26) (dual of [34, 8, 27]-code or 34-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6426, 64, F64, 26) (dual of [64, 38, 27]-code or 64-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(38,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6426, 64, F64, 26) (dual of [64, 38, 27]-code or 64-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- linear OA(82, 4, F8, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- linear OA(6426, 34, F64, 26) (dual of [34, 8, 27]-code or 34-arc in PG(25,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.