Information on Result #2251135
Linear OA(8141, 169, F8, 86) (dual of [169, 28, 87]-code), using 3 times truncation based on linear OA(8144, 172, F8, 89) (dual of [172, 28, 90]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6429, 43, F64, 29) (dual of [43, 14, 30]-code or 43-arc in PG(28,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6429, 64, F64, 29) (dual of [64, 35, 30]-code or 64-arc in PG(28,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(35,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6429, 64, F64, 29) (dual of [64, 35, 30]-code or 64-arc in PG(28,64)), using
- linear OA(82, 4, F8, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- linear OA(6429, 43, F64, 29) (dual of [43, 14, 30]-code or 43-arc in PG(28,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.