Information on Result #2251469
Linear OA(8167, 203, F8, 99) (dual of [203, 36, 100]-code), using 5 times truncation based on linear OA(8172, 208, F8, 104) (dual of [208, 36, 105]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6434, 52, F64, 34) (dual of [52, 18, 35]-code or 52-arc in PG(33,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6434, 64, F64, 34) (dual of [64, 30, 35]-code or 64-arc in PG(33,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(30,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6434, 64, F64, 34) (dual of [64, 30, 35]-code or 64-arc in PG(33,64)), using
- linear OA(82, 4, F8, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- linear OA(6434, 52, F64, 34) (dual of [52, 18, 35]-code or 52-arc in PG(33,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.