Information on Result #2252104
Linear OA(981, 85, F9, 71) (dual of [85, 4, 72]-code), using 9 times truncation based on linear OA(990, 94, F9, 80) (dual of [94, 4, 81]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C2 with C1 a [82,1,81]-code [i] based on
- linear OA(978, 82, F9, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using projective code from ovoid in PG(3, 9) [i]
- linear OA(99, 12, F9, 8) (dual of [12, 3, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(99, 19, F9, 8) (dual of [19, 10, 9]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(99, 19, F9, 8) (dual of [19, 10, 9]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.