Information on Result #2273949
Linear OA(491, 109, F4, 51) (dual of [109, 18, 52]-code), using 1 times code embedding in larger space based on linear OA(490, 108, F4, 51) (dual of [108, 18, 52]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6412, 18, F64, 12) (dual of [18, 6, 13]-code or 18-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6412, 64, F64, 12) (dual of [64, 52, 13]-code or 64-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(52,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6412, 64, F64, 12) (dual of [64, 52, 13]-code or 64-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6412, 18, F64, 12) (dual of [18, 6, 13]-code or 18-arc in PG(11,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.