Information on Result #2298413
Linear OA(2127, 143, F2, 56) (dual of [143, 16, 57]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(2128, 144, F2, 57) (dual of [144, 16, 58]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(440, 48, F4, 28) (dual of [48, 8, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(440, 49, F4, 28) (dual of [49, 9, 29]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(443, 52, F4, 31) (dual of [52, 9, 32]-code), using
- a “DaH†code from Brouwer’s database [i]
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(443, 52, F4, 31) (dual of [52, 9, 32]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(440, 49, F4, 28) (dual of [49, 9, 29]-code), using
- linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(440, 48, F4, 28) (dual of [48, 8, 29]-code), using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.