Information on Result #2416518
There is no linear OOA(825, 16, F8, 2, 24) (dual of [(16, 2), 7, 25]-NRT-code), because 1 step truncation would yield linear OOA(824, 15, F8, 2, 23) (dual of [(15, 2), 6, 24]-NRT-code), but
- 15 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(89, 15, F8, 8) (dual of [15, 6, 9]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.