Information on Result #2416540
There is no linear OOA(934, 19, F9, 2, 33) (dual of [(19, 2), 4, 34]-NRT-code), because 4 step truncation would yield linear OOA(930, 17, F9, 2, 29) (dual of [(17, 2), 4, 30]-NRT-code), but
- 17 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(913, 17, F9, 12) (dual of [17, 4, 13]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.