Information on Result #2428520
Linear OOA(2248, 126, F2, 2, 162) (dual of [(126, 2), 4, 163]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(2248, 126, F2, 2, 164) (dual of [(126, 2), 4, 165]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(440, 42, F4, 32) (dual of [42, 2, 33]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(443, 45, F4, 35) (dual of [45, 2, 36]-code), using
- repeating each code word 9 times [i] based on linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- repeating each code word 9 times [i] based on linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(443, 45, F4, 35) (dual of [45, 2, 36]-code), using
- linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,2) [i]
- linear OA(440, 42, F4, 32) (dual of [42, 2, 33]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.