Information on Result #2446458
Linear OOA(4258, 132, F4, 2, 197) (dual of [(132, 2), 6, 198]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(4258, 132, F4, 2, 199) (dual of [(132, 2), 6, 200]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1641, 44, F16, 39) (dual of [44, 3, 40]-code), using
- 8 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(1649, 52, F16, 47) (dual of [52, 3, 48]-code), using
- Denniston code D(2,16) [i]
- 8 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(1649, 52, F16, 47) (dual of [52, 3, 48]-code), using
- linear OOA(44, 3, F4, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(44, 4, F4, 2, 4) (dual of [(4, 2), 4, 5]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;4,4) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(44, 4, F4, 2, 4) (dual of [(4, 2), 4, 5]-NRT-code), using
- linear OA(1641, 44, F16, 39) (dual of [44, 3, 40]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.