Information on Result #2458975
Linear OOA(2195, 103, F2, 2, 105) (dual of [(103, 2), 11, 106]-NRT-code), using 1 step truncation based on linear OOA(2196, 104, F2, 2, 106) (dual of [(104, 2), 12, 107]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2196, 104, F2, 2, 109) (dual of [(104, 2), 12, 110]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1610, 13, F16, 10) (dual of [13, 3, 11]-code or 13-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1610, 16, F16, 10) (dual of [16, 6, 11]-code or 16-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1610, 16, F16, 10) (dual of [16, 6, 11]-code or 16-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- linear OOA(212, 8, F2, 2, 9) (dual of [(8, 2), 4, 10]-NRT-code), using
- linear OA(1610, 13, F16, 10) (dual of [13, 3, 11]-code or 13-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.