Information on Result #2472053
Linear OOA(4249, 130, F4, 2, 179) (dual of [(130, 2), 11, 180]-NRT-code), using 9 step truncation based on linear OOA(4258, 135, F4, 2, 188) (dual of [(135, 2), 12, 189]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(4258, 135, F4, 2, 191) (dual of [(135, 2), 12, 192]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6423, 27, F64, 23) (dual of [27, 4, 24]-code or 27-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6423, 64, F64, 23) (dual of [64, 41, 24]-code or 64-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(41,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6423, 64, F64, 23) (dual of [64, 41, 24]-code or 64-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- linear OOA(47, 5, F4, 2, 7) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 8]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,4) [i]
- linear OA(6423, 27, F64, 23) (dual of [27, 4, 24]-code or 27-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.