Information on Result #2474781
Linear OOA(5134, 69, F5, 2, 112) (dual of [(69, 2), 4, 113]-NRT-code), using 12 step truncation based on linear OOA(5146, 75, F5, 2, 124) (dual of [(75, 2), 4, 125]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(5146, 75, F5, 2, 125) (dual of [(75, 2), 4, 126]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2513, 15, F25, 13) (dual of [15, 2, 14]-code or 15-arc in PG(12,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2513, 25, F25, 13) (dual of [25, 12, 14]-code or 25-arc in PG(12,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(12,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2513, 25, F25, 13) (dual of [25, 12, 14]-code or 25-arc in PG(12,25)), using
- linear OOA(58, 5, F5, 2, 8) (dual of [(5, 2), 2, 9]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;2,5) [i]
- linear OA(2513, 15, F25, 13) (dual of [15, 2, 14]-code or 15-arc in PG(12,25)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.