Information on Result #2476358
Linear OOA(25104, 53, F25, 2, 102) (dual of [(53, 2), 2, 103]-NRT-code), using 6 step truncation based on linear OOA(25110, 56, F25, 2, 108) (dual of [(56, 2), 2, 109]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(256, 4, F25, 2, 6) (dual of [(4, 2), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(256, 25, F25, 2, 6) (dual of [(25, 2), 44, 7]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;44,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(256, 25, F25, 2, 6) (dual of [(25, 2), 44, 7]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(25102, 52, F25, 2, 101) (dual of [(52, 2), 2, 102]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(2550, 26, F25, 2, 50) (dual of [(26, 2), 2, 51]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,25) [i]
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(2550, 26, F25, 2, 50) (dual of [(26, 2), 2, 51]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(256, 4, F25, 2, 6) (dual of [(4, 2), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.