Information on Result #2609606
There is no linear OOA(8100, 35, F8, 3, 97) (dual of [(35, 3), 5, 98]-NRT-code), because 1 step truncation would yield linear OOA(899, 34, F8, 3, 96) (dual of [(34, 3), 3, 97]-NRT-code), but
- 68 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(831, 34, F8, 28) (dual of [34, 3, 29]-code), but
- “Mas†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.