MinT - Information on Result #520716

Information on Result #520716

There is no (99, 199, 211)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2¹⁹⁹, 211, S₂, 100), but

the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 50804 953207 292236 551534 673511 458196 841341 969851 436778 280888 303616 / 45135 > 2¹⁹⁹ [i]

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		This result only	Method
1	No (99, 200, 211)-net in base 2	[i]		m-Reduction
2	No (99, 201, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
3	No (99, 202, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
4	No (99, 203, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
5	No (99, 204, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
6	No (99, 205, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
7	No (99, 206, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
8	No (99, 207, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
9	No (99, 208, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
10	No (99, 209, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
11	No (99, 210, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
12	No (99, 211, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
13	No (99, 212, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
14	No (99, 213, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
15	No (99, 214, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
16	No (99, 215, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
17	No (99, 216, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
18	No (99, 217, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
19	No (99, 218, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
20	No (99, 219, 211)-net in base 2	[i]
21	No (99, 220, 211)-net in base 2	[i]