Information on Result #520939
There is no (121, 229, 259)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2229, 259, S2, 108), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 17498 495097 789040 453213 386774 622994 352540 479460 641070 835741 390745 701581 780259 176448 / 19 797109 545047 > 2229 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (121, 230, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (121, 231, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (121, 232, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (121, 233, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (121, 234, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (121, 235, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (121, 236, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (121, 237, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (121, 238, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (121, 239, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (121, 240, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (121, 241, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (121, 242, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (121, 243, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (121, 244, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (121, 245, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (121, 246, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (121, 247, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (121, 248, 259)-net in base 2 | [i] |