Information on Result #520991

There is no (130, 238, 287)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2238, 287, S2, 108), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 239, 287)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (130, 240, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (130, 241, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (130, 242, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (130, 243, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (130, 244, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (130, 245, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (130, 246, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (130, 247, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (130, 248, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (130, 249, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (130, 250, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (130, 251, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (130, 252, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (130, 253, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (130, 254, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (130, 255, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (130, 256, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (130, 257, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (130, 258, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (130, 259, 287)-net in base 2 [i]
22No (130, 260, 287)-net in base 2 [i]