Information on Result #523710

There is no (11, 65, 225)-net in base 9, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(965, 225, S9, 54), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (11, 66, 225)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (11, 67, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (11, 68, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (11, 69, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (11, 70, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (11, 71, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (11, 72, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (11, 73, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (11, 74, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (11, 75, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (11, 76, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (11, 77, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (11, 78, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (11, 79, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (11, 80, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (11, 81, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (11, 82, 225)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (11, 83, 225)-net in base 9 [i]