Information on Result #524128

There is no (3, 90, 96)-net in base 25, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2590, 96, S25, 87), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (3, 91, 96)-net in base 25 [i]m-Reduction
2No (3, 92, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
3No (3, 93, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
4No (3, 94, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
5No (3, 95, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
6No (3, 96, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
7No (3, 97, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
8No (3, 98, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
9No (3, 99, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
10No (3, 100, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
11No (3, 101, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
12No (3, 102, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
13No (3, 103, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
14No (3, 104, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
15No (3, 105, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
16No (3, 106, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
17No (3, 107, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
18No (3, 108, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
19No (3, 109, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
20No (3, 110, 96)-net in base 25 [i]
21No (3, m, 96)-net in base 25 for arbitrarily large m [i]m-Reduction from Arbitrarily Large Net