Information on Result #524301

There is no linear OA(55, 89, F5, 3) (dual of [89, 84, 4]-code or 89-cap in PG(4,5)), because a result by Edel, Storme, and Sziklai

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(55, 89, F5, 2, 3) (dual of [(89, 2), 173, 4]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(55, 89, F5, 3, 3) (dual of [(89, 3), 262, 4]-NRT-code) [i]
3No digital (2, 5, 89)-net over F5 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
4No 89-cap in AG(4,5) [i]Every Affine Cap Is Also a Projective Cap
5No linear OA(593, 98, F5, 75) (dual of [98, 5, 76]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)
6No linear OA(599, 104, F5, 80) (dual of [104, 5, 81]-code) [i]
7No linear OA(5105, 110, F5, 85) (dual of [110, 5, 86]-code) [i]
8No linear OA(5117, 122, F5, 95) (dual of [122, 5, 96]-code) [i]
9No linear OA(56, 435, F5, 3) (dual of [435, 429, 4]-code or 435-cap in PG(5,5)) [i]Hill Recurrence