Information on Result #547271
There is no linear OA(4196, 201, F4, 148) (dual of [201, 5, 149]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(448, 52, F4, 37) (dual of [52, 4, 38]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(447, 51, F4, 36) (dual of [51, 4, 37]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OA(4197, 202, F4, 149) (dual of [202, 5, 150]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | No linear OA(4198, 203, F4, 150) (dual of [203, 5, 151]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OA(4199, 204, F4, 151) (dual of [204, 5, 152]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(4196, 201, F4, 2, 148) (dual of [(201, 2), 206, 149]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 5 | No linear OA(4197, 205, F4, 148) (dual of [205, 8, 149]-code) | [i] | Construction Y1 (Bound) | |