Information on Result #547594

There is no linear OA(8150, 295, F8, 128) (dual of [295, 145, 129]-code), because residual code would yield OA(822, 166, S8, 16), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(8151, 296, F8, 129) (dual of [296, 145, 130]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(8152, 297, F8, 130) (dual of [297, 145, 131]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(8153, 298, F8, 131) (dual of [298, 145, 132]-code) [i]
4No linear OA(8154, 299, F8, 132) (dual of [299, 145, 133]-code) [i]
5No linear OA(8155, 300, F8, 133) (dual of [300, 145, 134]-code) [i]
6No linear OA(8156, 301, F8, 134) (dual of [301, 145, 135]-code) [i]
7No linear OA(8157, 302, F8, 135) (dual of [302, 145, 136]-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(8151, 295, F8, 2, 129) (dual of [(295, 2), 439, 130]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
9No linear OOA(8152, 295, F8, 2, 130) (dual of [(295, 2), 438, 131]-NRT-code) [i]
10No linear OOA(8153, 295, F8, 2, 131) (dual of [(295, 2), 437, 132]-NRT-code) [i]
11No linear OOA(8154, 295, F8, 2, 132) (dual of [(295, 2), 436, 133]-NRT-code) [i]
12No linear OOA(8155, 295, F8, 2, 133) (dual of [(295, 2), 435, 134]-NRT-code) [i]
13No linear OOA(8156, 295, F8, 2, 134) (dual of [(295, 2), 434, 135]-NRT-code) [i]
14No linear OOA(8157, 295, F8, 2, 135) (dual of [(295, 2), 433, 136]-NRT-code) [i]
15No linear OOA(8150, 295, F8, 2, 128) (dual of [(295, 2), 440, 129]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
16No linear OOA(8150, 295, F8, 3, 128) (dual of [(295, 3), 735, 129]-NRT-code) [i]
17No digital (22, 150, 295)-net over F8 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array