Information on Result #547881

There is no linear OA(4151, 185, F4, 112) (dual of [185, 34, 113]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(4150, 165, F4, 112) (dual of [165, 15, 113]-code), but
  2. OA(434, 185, S4, 20), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4152, 186, F4, 113) (dual of [186, 34, 114]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4153, 187, F4, 114) (dual of [187, 34, 115]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4154, 188, F4, 115) (dual of [188, 34, 116]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4152, 185, F4, 2, 113) (dual of [(185, 2), 218, 114]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4153, 185, F4, 2, 114) (dual of [(185, 2), 217, 115]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4154, 185, F4, 2, 115) (dual of [(185, 2), 216, 116]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4151, 185, F4, 2, 112) (dual of [(185, 2), 219, 113]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4151, 185, F4, 3, 112) (dual of [(185, 3), 404, 113]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (39, 151, 185)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array