Information on Result #548336

There is no linear OA(2149, 168, F2, 74) (dual of [168, 19, 75]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(275, 93, F2, 37) (dual of [93, 18, 38]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2150, 169, F2, 75) (dual of [169, 19, 76]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2150, 168, F2, 2, 75) (dual of [(168, 2), 186, 76]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2149, 168, F2, 2, 74) (dual of [(168, 2), 187, 75]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2149, 168, F2, 3, 74) (dual of [(168, 3), 355, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2149, 168, F2, 4, 74) (dual of [(168, 4), 523, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2149, 168, F2, 5, 74) (dual of [(168, 5), 691, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2149, 168, F2, 6, 74) (dual of [(168, 6), 859, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2149, 168, F2, 7, 74) (dual of [(168, 7), 1027, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2149, 168, F2, 8, 74) (dual of [(168, 8), 1195, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (75, 149, 168)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array