Information on Result #548424
There is no linear OA(2242, 253, F2, 122) (dual of [253, 11, 123]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(2120, 130, F2, 61) (dual of [130, 10, 62]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(2119, 129, F2, 60) (dual of [129, 10, 61]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(259, 68, F2, 30) (dual of [68, 9, 31]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(260, 69, F2, 31) (dual of [69, 9, 32]-code), but
- “BGV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(260, 69, F2, 31) (dual of [69, 9, 32]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(259, 68, F2, 30) (dual of [68, 9, 31]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OA(2243, 254, F2, 123) (dual of [254, 11, 124]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | No linear OOA(2242, 253, F2, 2, 122) (dual of [(253, 2), 264, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
3 | No linear OOA(2242, 253, F2, 3, 122) (dual of [(253, 3), 517, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(2242, 253, F2, 4, 122) (dual of [(253, 4), 770, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(2242, 253, F2, 5, 122) (dual of [(253, 5), 1023, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2242, 253, F2, 6, 122) (dual of [(253, 6), 1276, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
7 | No linear OOA(2242, 253, F2, 7, 122) (dual of [(253, 7), 1529, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
8 | No linear OOA(2242, 253, F2, 8, 122) (dual of [(253, 8), 1782, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] |