Information on Result #548538

There is no linear OA(297, 109, F2, 48) (dual of [109, 12, 49]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(296, 105, F2, 48) (dual of [105, 9, 49]-code), but
  2. OA(212, 109, S2, 4), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(298, 110, F2, 49) (dual of [110, 12, 50]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(298, 109, F2, 2, 49) (dual of [(109, 2), 120, 50]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(297, 109, F2, 2, 48) (dual of [(109, 2), 121, 49]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(297, 109, F2, 3, 48) (dual of [(109, 3), 230, 49]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(297, 109, F2, 4, 48) (dual of [(109, 4), 339, 49]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(297, 109, F2, 5, 48) (dual of [(109, 5), 448, 49]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(297, 109, F2, 6, 48) (dual of [(109, 6), 557, 49]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(297, 109, F2, 7, 48) (dual of [(109, 7), 666, 49]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(297, 109, F2, 8, 48) (dual of [(109, 8), 775, 49]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (49, 97, 109)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array