Information on Result #548539

There is no linear OA(2129, 141, F2, 64) (dual of [141, 12, 65]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(2128, 137, F2, 64) (dual of [137, 9, 65]-code), but
  2. OA(212, 141, S2, 4), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2130, 142, F2, 65) (dual of [142, 12, 66]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2130, 141, F2, 2, 65) (dual of [(141, 2), 152, 66]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2129, 141, F2, 2, 64) (dual of [(141, 2), 153, 65]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2129, 141, F2, 3, 64) (dual of [(141, 3), 294, 65]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2129, 141, F2, 4, 64) (dual of [(141, 4), 435, 65]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2129, 141, F2, 5, 64) (dual of [(141, 5), 576, 65]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2129, 141, F2, 6, 64) (dual of [(141, 6), 717, 65]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2129, 141, F2, 7, 64) (dual of [(141, 7), 858, 65]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2129, 141, F2, 8, 64) (dual of [(141, 8), 999, 65]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (65, 129, 141)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array