Information on Result #548546

There is no linear OA(2157, 210, F2, 74) (dual of [210, 53, 75]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(2156, 190, F2, 74) (dual of [190, 34, 75]-code), but
  2. OA(253, 210, S2, 20), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2158, 211, F2, 75) (dual of [211, 53, 76]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2158, 210, F2, 2, 75) (dual of [(210, 2), 262, 76]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2157, 210, F2, 2, 74) (dual of [(210, 2), 263, 75]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2157, 210, F2, 3, 74) (dual of [(210, 3), 473, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2157, 210, F2, 4, 74) (dual of [(210, 4), 683, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2157, 210, F2, 5, 74) (dual of [(210, 5), 893, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2157, 210, F2, 6, 74) (dual of [(210, 6), 1103, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2157, 210, F2, 7, 74) (dual of [(210, 7), 1313, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2157, 210, F2, 8, 74) (dual of [(210, 8), 1523, 75]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (83, 157, 210)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
11No linear OA(2158, 244, F2, 74) (dual of [244, 86, 75]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)