Information on Result #548585

There is no linear OA(336, 46, F3, 24) (dual of [46, 10, 25]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(335, 40, F3, 24) (dual of [40, 5, 25]-code), but
  2. OA(310, 46, S3, 6), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(337, 47, F3, 25) (dual of [47, 10, 26]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(337, 46, F3, 2, 25) (dual of [(46, 2), 55, 26]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(336, 46, F3, 2, 24) (dual of [(46, 2), 56, 25]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(336, 46, F3, 3, 24) (dual of [(46, 3), 102, 25]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(336, 46, F3, 4, 24) (dual of [(46, 4), 148, 25]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(336, 46, F3, 5, 24) (dual of [(46, 5), 194, 25]-NRT-code) [i]
7No digital (12, 36, 46)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
8No linear OA(337, 62, F3, 24) (dual of [62, 25, 25]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)