Information on Result #548601

There is no linear OA(3170, 179, F3, 114) (dual of [179, 9, 115]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(3169, 175, F3, 114) (dual of [175, 6, 115]-code), but
  2. OA(39, 179, S3, 4), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3171, 180, F3, 115) (dual of [180, 9, 116]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3172, 181, F3, 116) (dual of [181, 9, 117]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3171, 179, F3, 2, 115) (dual of [(179, 2), 187, 116]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3172, 179, F3, 2, 116) (dual of [(179, 2), 186, 117]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3170, 179, F3, 2, 114) (dual of [(179, 2), 188, 115]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3170, 179, F3, 3, 114) (dual of [(179, 3), 367, 115]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3170, 179, F3, 4, 114) (dual of [(179, 4), 546, 115]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3170, 179, F3, 5, 114) (dual of [(179, 5), 725, 115]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (56, 170, 179)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array