Information on Result #548637

There is no linear OA(712, 36, F7, 10) (dual of [36, 24, 11]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(711, 15, F7, 10) (dual of [15, 4, 11]-code), but
  2. linear OA(724, 36, F7, 21) (dual of [36, 12, 22]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(713, 37, F7, 11) (dual of [37, 24, 12]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(713, 36, F7, 2, 11) (dual of [(36, 2), 59, 12]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(712, 36, F7, 2, 10) (dual of [(36, 2), 60, 11]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(712, 36, F7, 3, 10) (dual of [(36, 3), 96, 11]-NRT-code) [i]
5No digital (2, 12, 36)-net over F7 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
6No linear OA(728, 40, F7, 24) (dual of [40, 12, 25]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)