Information on Result #549148
There is no linear OOA(2242, 253, F2, 2, 122) (dual of [(253, 2), 264, 123]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OA(2242, 253, F2, 122) (dual of [253, 11, 123]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2120, 130, F2, 61) (dual of [130, 10, 62]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(2119, 129, F2, 60) (dual of [129, 10, 61]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(259, 68, F2, 30) (dual of [68, 9, 31]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(260, 69, F2, 31) (dual of [69, 9, 32]-code), but
- “BGV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(260, 69, F2, 31) (dual of [69, 9, 32]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(259, 68, F2, 30) (dual of [68, 9, 31]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(2119, 129, F2, 60) (dual of [129, 10, 61]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.