Information on Result #550571
There is no linear OOA(28, 12, F2, 2, 5) (dual of [(12, 2), 16, 6]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(27, 12, F2, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(28, 12, F2, 3, 5) (dual of [(12, 3), 28, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(28, 12, F2, 4, 5) (dual of [(12, 4), 40, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(28, 12, F2, 5, 5) (dual of [(12, 5), 52, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(28, 12, F2, 6, 5) (dual of [(12, 6), 64, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(28, 12, F2, 7, 5) (dual of [(12, 7), 76, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(28, 12, F2, 8, 5) (dual of [(12, 8), 88, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||