Information on Result #550589
There is no linear OOA(222, 34, F2, 2, 11) (dual of [(34, 2), 46, 12]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(221, 34, F2, 10) (dual of [34, 13, 11]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(222, 35, F2, 11) (dual of [35, 13, 12]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(222, 34, F2, 3, 11) (dual of [(34, 3), 80, 12]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(222, 34, F2, 4, 11) (dual of [(34, 4), 114, 12]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(222, 34, F2, 5, 11) (dual of [(34, 5), 148, 12]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(222, 34, F2, 6, 11) (dual of [(34, 6), 182, 12]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(222, 34, F2, 7, 11) (dual of [(34, 7), 216, 12]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(222, 34, F2, 8, 11) (dual of [(34, 8), 250, 12]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||