Information on Result #550620
There is no linear OOA(235, 38, F2, 2, 20) (dual of [(38, 2), 41, 21]-NRT-code), because 4 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(231, 38, F2, 16) (dual of [38, 7, 17]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(215, 21, F2, 8) (dual of [21, 6, 9]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(27, 12, F2, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(235, 38, F2, 3, 20) (dual of [(38, 3), 79, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(235, 38, F2, 4, 20) (dual of [(38, 4), 117, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(235, 38, F2, 5, 20) (dual of [(38, 5), 155, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(235, 38, F2, 6, 20) (dual of [(38, 6), 193, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(235, 38, F2, 7, 20) (dual of [(38, 7), 231, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(235, 38, F2, 8, 20) (dual of [(38, 8), 269, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||