Information on Result #550713
There is no linear OOA(252, 79, F2, 2, 25) (dual of [(79, 2), 106, 26]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(251, 79, F2, 24) (dual of [79, 28, 25]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(252, 79, F2, 3, 25) (dual of [(79, 3), 185, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(252, 79, F2, 4, 25) (dual of [(79, 4), 264, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(252, 79, F2, 5, 25) (dual of [(79, 5), 343, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(252, 79, F2, 6, 25) (dual of [(79, 6), 422, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(252, 79, F2, 7, 25) (dual of [(79, 7), 501, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(252, 79, F2, 8, 25) (dual of [(79, 8), 580, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||