Information on Result #550868
There is no linear OOA(270, 84, F2, 2, 35) (dual of [(84, 2), 98, 36]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(269, 84, F2, 34) (dual of [84, 15, 35]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(270, 84, F2, 3, 35) (dual of [(84, 3), 182, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(270, 84, F2, 4, 35) (dual of [(84, 4), 266, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(270, 84, F2, 5, 35) (dual of [(84, 5), 350, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(270, 84, F2, 6, 35) (dual of [(84, 6), 434, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(270, 84, F2, 7, 35) (dual of [(84, 7), 518, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(270, 84, F2, 8, 35) (dual of [(84, 8), 602, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||