Information on Result #550960
There is no linear OOA(278, 81, F2, 2, 42) (dual of [(81, 2), 84, 43]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(276, 81, F2, 40) (dual of [81, 5, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(278, 81, F2, 3, 42) (dual of [(81, 3), 165, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(278, 81, F2, 4, 42) (dual of [(81, 4), 246, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(278, 81, F2, 5, 42) (dual of [(81, 5), 327, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(278, 81, F2, 6, 42) (dual of [(81, 6), 408, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(278, 81, F2, 7, 42) (dual of [(81, 7), 489, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(278, 81, F2, 8, 42) (dual of [(81, 8), 570, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||