Information on Result #550970
There is no linear OOA(279, 85, F2, 2, 41) (dual of [(85, 2), 91, 42]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(278, 85, F2, 40) (dual of [85, 7, 41]-code), but
- “Hel†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(279, 85, F2, 3, 41) (dual of [(85, 3), 176, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(279, 85, F2, 4, 41) (dual of [(85, 4), 261, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(279, 85, F2, 5, 41) (dual of [(85, 5), 346, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(279, 85, F2, 6, 41) (dual of [(85, 6), 431, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(279, 85, F2, 7, 41) (dual of [(85, 7), 516, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(279, 85, F2, 8, 41) (dual of [(85, 8), 601, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||