Information on Result #550974
There is no linear OOA(279, 77, F2, 2, 45) (dual of [(77, 2), 75, 46]-NRT-code), because 9 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(270, 77, F2, 36) (dual of [77, 7, 37]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(234, 40, F2, 18) (dual of [40, 6, 19]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(279, 77, F2, 3, 45) (dual of [(77, 3), 152, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(279, 77, F2, 4, 45) (dual of [(77, 4), 229, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(279, 77, F2, 5, 45) (dual of [(77, 5), 306, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(279, 77, F2, 6, 45) (dual of [(77, 6), 383, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(279, 77, F2, 7, 45) (dual of [(77, 7), 460, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(279, 77, F2, 8, 45) (dual of [(77, 8), 537, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||