Information on Result #551054
There is no linear OOA(285, 83, F2, 2, 48) (dual of [(83, 2), 81, 49]-NRT-code), because 8 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(277, 83, F2, 40) (dual of [83, 6, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(285, 83, F2, 3, 48) (dual of [(83, 3), 164, 49]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(285, 83, F2, 4, 48) (dual of [(83, 4), 247, 49]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(285, 83, F2, 5, 48) (dual of [(83, 5), 330, 49]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(285, 83, F2, 6, 48) (dual of [(83, 6), 413, 49]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||