Information on Result #551117
There is no linear OOA(290, 102, F2, 2, 45) (dual of [(102, 2), 114, 46]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(289, 102, F2, 44) (dual of [102, 13, 45]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(290, 102, F2, 3, 45) (dual of [(102, 3), 216, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(290, 102, F2, 4, 45) (dual of [(102, 4), 318, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(290, 102, F2, 5, 45) (dual of [(102, 5), 420, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(290, 102, F2, 6, 45) (dual of [(102, 6), 522, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(290, 102, F2, 7, 45) (dual of [(102, 7), 624, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(290, 102, F2, 8, 45) (dual of [(102, 8), 726, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||