Information on Result #551156
There is no linear OOA(293, 103, F2, 2, 47) (dual of [(103, 2), 113, 48]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(292, 103, F2, 46) (dual of [103, 11, 47]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(293, 104, F2, 47) (dual of [104, 11, 48]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(293, 103, F2, 3, 47) (dual of [(103, 3), 216, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(293, 103, F2, 4, 47) (dual of [(103, 4), 319, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(293, 103, F2, 5, 47) (dual of [(103, 5), 422, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(293, 103, F2, 6, 47) (dual of [(103, 6), 525, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(293, 103, F2, 7, 47) (dual of [(103, 7), 628, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(293, 103, F2, 8, 47) (dual of [(103, 8), 731, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||